Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac15,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemApple iMac15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-42FD25EABCABB274
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '20 at 18:12
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$56
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 218
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 432
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 M290X
Apple(106B 0138) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 42.8
27% 35.8 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 36.9
27% 31.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 71 54 59 64 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 16.4
Write 54.5
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 64
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
30GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 9 8.3 8.9 8.4 8.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
7.72% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 8.7
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 8.4
15% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.2
75% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.72%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343531533641465238412D50422020 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac15,1 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Apple iMac15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback