Asus P-P5N9300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P-P5N9300 (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081230
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '17 at 21:14
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E6300-$66 2,604 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 59.2 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 78.9 38% 59.5 Pts	4-Core 77.2 8-Core 77.4 10% 77.3 Pts	64-Core 78.9 5% 78.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300 / nForce 730i 229 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8356) 64MB Ram: 64MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 0.38 1% 1.22 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 2 2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 32870091 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11279 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 233348795 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8539 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6974 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 47245361185 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 58 48 739901482 (C2) HDA temperature 42 52 73014444074 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 24 32870091 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 107850923789736 (F1) Unknown 100 253 853768132 (F2) Unknown 100 253 917922890	53.6% Above average	Read 92.5 Write 94.3 Mixed 32.5 54% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.32 83% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,197 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 50GB free, PID 0100 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 33.2 Mixed 15.6 33% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.18 54% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DRAM Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 4.7 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P-P5N9300 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P-P5N9300

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9300 / nForce 730iNvidiaBench 1%, 229 samples	3x

SSD
BT58SSD07S 120GBBench 59%, 385 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $170

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16