HP 22-b050nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 22-b050nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81BA
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 18 '20 at 13:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 60%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 86
50% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 131
15% 119 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 81BA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 8.23
Parallax 6.03
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 5.57
Splatting 12.8
8% 8.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 121 107 116 129 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 167
Write 128
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 115
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
698GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 77 97 112 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 43
Write 88.7
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 89.7
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8213.C8FDR1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.3% Above average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 21.3
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback