Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron B800 2,662 User benchmarks, average bench 40% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Memory 44.9 1-Core 19.2 2-Core 29.7 23% 31.3 Pts	4-Core 35.4 8-Core 29.5 4% 32.5 Pts	64-Core 35.5 2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1297 2027) 2.5GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.81 Parallax 0.59 0% 0.68 fps	MRender 1.14 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3600RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 50 58 69 69 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 353 Write 107 Mixed 102 SusWrite 62.3 34% 156 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 11.9 44% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 86.1 DQ Write 51.4 DQ Mixed 39.9 38% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76.B346G.C280C Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.2% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron B800IntelBench 40%, 2,662 samples	34x
Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples	7x
Pentium B960IntelBench 44%, 13,355 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	44x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	3x

RAM
SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 2x2GBSmartBench 33%, 376 samples	4x
SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 1x2GBSmartBench 18%, 655 samples	4x
SH564128FH8NZPHSCR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 753 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16