Average Bench: 2.61% (460th of 665)

Based on 359,543 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 0166 Models: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000, Intel(R) HD Graphics, Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 (Intel Corporation - WDDM 1.3)

Terrible average bench

The Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) averaged 97.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 3.81fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 2.25fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) is just 1.2%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 3.79fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 2.66fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 359,543 samples)
Min Avg Max
2.9 Lighting 3.81 4.6
1.4 Reflection 3.79 8.58
1.7 Parallax 2.66 3.1
3.07% 3.42 fps
Min Avg Max
2.9 MRender 4.14 5.2
1.6 Gravity 2.25 2.6
2.8 Splatting 4.58 5.4
2.07% 3.66 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 3.1
3% 3.1 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.4
2% 4.17 fps
Dell(1028 058F) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.5
2% 3.73 fps
Legend(17AA 3977) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.7
4% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
1% 2.27 fps
Legend(17AA 5002) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 2.5
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
2% 3.63 fps
Clevo(1558 2706) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 2.6
3% 3.3 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
2% 3.8 fps
Dell(1028 056E) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
2% 3.27 fps
Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 2.7
0% 2.53 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
2% 3.87 fps
359,543 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 44,935,486 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 359,543 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Legend(17AA 3977) 3% 2% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0597) 2% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 179B) 2% 3% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 18DF) 1% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 183E) 1% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C652) 1% 2% ± 1%
Dell(1028 053D) 1% 3% ± 0%
Acer(1025 064B) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0572) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 10FD) 1% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 2103) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0534) 1% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 17DF) 1% 3% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0647) 1% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 17F6) 1% 3% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 21F9) 1% 3% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 21F5) 1% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 17AB) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 124D) 1% 3% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0686) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 1587) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 1457) 1% 3% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 16C2) 1% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1% 3% ± 1%
Dell(1028 0591) 1% 3% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 21FB) 1% 3% ± 1%
Sony(104D 90AB) 1% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 1% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C0DC) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0535) 1% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 1970) 1% 3% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 1% 3% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 5000) 1% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 218F) 1% 3% ± 0%
Microsoft(1414 0166) 1% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0835) 1% 2% ± 0%
Sony(104D 90B8) 1% 3% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 21F7) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 10AC) 1% 2% ± 0%
Intel(8086 2044) 1% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 10D9) 1% 3% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 5018) 1% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 183F) 1% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C706) 1% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 1854) 1% 2% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C709) 1% 2% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) Builds (Compare 3,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 3521

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $35

Popular HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

24 days ago.

Its ok for lighter games and some esports titles.


Excellent

2 months ago.

Surprisingly runs Android Minecraft (1.16.201) fullscreen at 1600x900, 14 chunk render distance no problem on Ubuntu 20.04

Tutorial  github.com/...


Good

3 months ago.

Older Games are running fine, even csgo runs with over 60fps most of the time, dont know why people complain. :)


Terrible

1 month ago.

Worst GPU as far as I've heard. Haven't compared it directly to anything else, but it's horrible. I can barely run Roblox at 50fps on minimum settings, and even the best performing shaders on Minecraft get me around 10fps. I have no clue why ANYONE would want to use this but don't. I don't care how much you want to cut corners, this GPU is practically unusable.


Poor

16 days ago.

Pro: lowish power draw. Cons: Absolutely abysmal performance. If you have the option to use dedicated graphics or an eGPU, use that instead. This can barely play minecraft at 720p at medium settings at 20-30fps. Overclock if possible.


Good

14 months ago.

It's enough for watching HD videos. That's all, for better or worse.


Good

6 days ago.

is not that bad for a free CPU card. Is enough for Minecraft and 1080p youtube videos


Excellent

6 months ago.


Poor

11 months ago.

no configuration ni heat silent and perfect display.


Terrible

6 months ago.

this is really good graphics card in terms of both working and gaming


Excellent

3 months ago.

amazing cant wait to play cyberpunk with it :]


Good

2 years ago.

Works well for over 5 years...


Poor

19 months ago.

Can barely run Minecraft at a good FPS


Terrible

1 month ago.

Old and terrible . Whines so loud i can barely hear my laptop audio whenever any game made after 2015 is loaded . New portable graphics cards are substantially better .


Poor

3 months ago.

can run Minecraft at 30 fps or lower. if you don't play games and just watch YouTube or something like that you should be fine


Average

3 months ago.

It's a decent iGPU for my eight year old dell laptop. Older video games from the 2000's can be played in 720p. Crysis does struggle to get above 30fps on the lowest settings at 720p.


Poor

6 months ago.

Don't recommend it for gaming and watch videos only at 720p since when its at 1080p it will start to lag, i manage to record videos on 720p60fps with a i5-3337U though


Poor

8 months ago.

slow not good for gaming


Terrible

21 months ago.

Tried to play World of Tanks Blitz. It worked but ran worse than an Ipad air from 2014. Totally terrible. Ran the game at 50fps on high, not maxed out settings.


Your
opinion?
665 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback