HP 240 G4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 240 G4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 80BC
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 106
50% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 164
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 80BC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 6.03
0% 4.16 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 8.83
6% 6.48 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 54 57 55 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 52.1
Write 50.8
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 55.2
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GRSL Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 240 G4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback