Asus 1215N

Performance Results

Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 25%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.57% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus 1215N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1215N
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110505
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 18:25
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Atom D525-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Memory 47.1
1-Core 11.9
2-Core 19.9
21% 26.3 Pts
4-Core 36.6
8-Core 37.2
5% 36.9 Pts
64-Core 37.6
2% 37.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia ION
Asus(1043 8446) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 267.54
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 0.41
1% 1.22 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.79 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GBSJ 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CJTA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 55 58 52 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Read 73.3
Write 65.1
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 59.1
15% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3
10% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.8
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 1215N Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 25%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus 1215N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $245
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $245Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback