Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DG33TL
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 18:07
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 75
39% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 139
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia ION
Zotac(19DA 2117) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.3
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
612GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 190 203 175 151 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.4% Average
Read 207
Write 194
Mixed 181
SusWrite 183
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 27.3
85% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 67.7
DQ Mixed 41.5
34% 47 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 133%
ST3200822A 120GB
48GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 148 130 118 101 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 209
Write 195
Mixed 165
SusWrite 136
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 26.8
90% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 40.6
34% 46.6 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.4
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback