Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-HP4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-HP4  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 05:00
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 51
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 151
55% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 214
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 217
14% 217 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 3GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5146
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.56 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 100 101 113 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 94.9
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 92.4
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL10-10-10 D3-1600 029E CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-HP4 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HP4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback