ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision 7510

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell Precision 7510 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 00V5FJ
Memory	50 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200217
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '20 at 01:54
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 1,588 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 67.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 201 68% 124 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 417 45% 357 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000M 5,864 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Dell(1028 06D9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.06 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 14.1 15% 15.6 fps	MRender 23.4 Gravity 20.8 Splatting 15.8 16% 20 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 441GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 401 406 409 417 435 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	109% Outstanding	Read 425 Write 390 Mixed 360 SusWrite 410 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 90.5 4K Mixed 51.2 169% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 322 243% 325 MB/s
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 1TB 2,610 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 377GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXV77D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 557 522 527 514 532 506 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 898 Write 579 Mixed 436 SusWrite 526 136% 610 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 31.9 146% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 594 DQ Write 402 DQ Mixed 508 376% 501 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 201%
Seagate BUP BL 5TB 976 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 629GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 85 87 86 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 100 Write 121 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 84.9 70% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.7 176% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 66%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 28GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 36 25 26 20 24 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	26% Poor	Read 93.1 Write 62 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 32.4 78% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.5 117% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF HMA82GS7MFR8N-TF HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF HMA82GS7MFR8N-TF 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.9% Very good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23.5 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 21.3 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Precision 7510 Builds (Compare 2,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 7510

CPU
Core i7-6820HQIntelBench 60%, 33,920 samples	1,650x
Core i7-6920HQIntelBench 70%, 3,282 samples	314x
Xeon E3-1535M v5IntelBench 69%, 1,588 samples	226x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1,330x
Quadro M2000MNvidiaBench 16%, 5,864 samples	508x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	292x

SSD
THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 122%, 19,561 samples	82x
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 140%, 7,011 samples	56x
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 120%, 13,766 samples	45x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	351x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 5,035 samples	265x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 69%, 5,073 samples	159x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback