Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$128 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 67.4 1-Core 116 2-Core 231 75% 138 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 608 64% 512 Pts	64-Core 585 36% 585 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 36EB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	2.83% Terrible	Lighting 0 Reflection 8.81 Parallax 6.44 0% 5.08 fps	MRender 9.57 Gravity 5.63 Splatting 13.8 8% 9.68 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.83% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W128G1001 128GB 504 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 101 104 76 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 365 Write 218 Mixed 286 SusWrite 80.2 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 33.4 113% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 242 185% 252 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 192 194 175 184 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 185 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 182 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5143TB2-CTD 2x4GB 346 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	57% Above average	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 20 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 10.9 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 113%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16