Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 70.9 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 158 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 434 44% 358 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 80D6) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8189 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.65% Terrible	Lighting 6.83 Reflection 14.8 Parallax 6.88 6% 9.52 fps	MRender 10.1 Gravity 6.43 Splatting 14.1 9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.65% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 272 272 272 262 259 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 311 Write 260 Mixed 225 SusWrite 269 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 12.6 36% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 181 161% 240 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 126%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 177GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 360 286 278 293 253 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	70% Good	Read 381 Write 325 Mixed 298 SusWrite 304 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 18.9 78% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 261 204% 275 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 123%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 286GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 103 102 101 102 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 106 Write 96.5 Mixed 30 SusWrite 102 60% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 23.7 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 20 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 99.4 40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	633x
Quadro M3000MNvidiaBench 27%, 1,726 samples	287x
Quadro M4000MNvidiaBench 34%, 731 samples	96x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	73x
MTFDDAV512TBN-1AR15ABHA 512GBCrucialBench 78%, 710 samples	58x
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples	53x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	74x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	72x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	43x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16