Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) 5,170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 37.6 1-Core 27.1 2-Core 55.3 25% 40 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 110 14% 107 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,472 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 81F5) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	1.9% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 4.27 Parallax 2.81 2% 3.08 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.09 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.9% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$71 31,280 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 443GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0906B SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 317 294 295 305 305 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 413 Write 337 Mixed 334 SusWrite 306 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 30.3 98% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 104 85% 121 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 127%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 12GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 6.5 16% 5.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 6.8 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 214 19% 214 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,525x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,765x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,192x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	403x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	383x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	351x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28