Today's hottest deals

LG R590-U.AAA2BT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLG R590-U.AAA2BT  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100114
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 09:58
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 330
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 37.5
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 57.7
29% 46.9 Pts
4-Core 97.4
8-Core 109
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M
Device(1854 0832) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.54
Parallax 1.62
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 3
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 167 175 194 200 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.3% Average
Read 169
Write 155
Mixed 169
SusWrite 178
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 15.1
51% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 113
96% 140 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 114%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
13GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3.1 2.3 2.7 3.4 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5
Write 1.5
SusWrite 2.9
4% 3.13 MB/s
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R590-U.AAA2BT Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: LG R590-U.AAA2BT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback