Aopen_ AWRDACPI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAopen_ AWRDACPI  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20041014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 16:10
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 100
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 33.8
43% 52.9 Pts
4-Core 29.4
8-Core 33.6
4% 31.5 Pts
64-Core 28.3
2% 28.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro AGP
PwrHis(1787 0028) 512MB
Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.42
Parallax 1.75
2% 2.36 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 0.04
1% 1.05 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F500S 256G 256GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware:
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.4% Very poor
Read 92.5
Write 86.3
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 25
15% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.6
22% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.8
4% 1.4 GB/s
Latency 34.8
115% 34.8 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback