HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8257
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 11:25
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 41.8
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 120
45% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 205
30% 218 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8257) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 7.81
Parallax 5.16
4% 6.1 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 11.2
7% 7.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000H1 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 121 126 129 134 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 363
Write 303
Mixed 276
SusWrite 124
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 16.6
82% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 138
146% 236 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59%
Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 111 112 113 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 129
Write 101
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 111
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.8
235% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback