Acer Predator PO9-900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PO9-900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO9-900
Memory11.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime8 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 13:00
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 69
1-Core 125
2-Core 238
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 823
76% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,652
102% 1,652 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Sapphire(174B 1470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.5% Outstanding
Lighting 104
Reflection 185
Parallax 187
85% 159 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 164
Splatting 117
107% 132 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 821 720 686 691 707 766 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,172
Write 1,107
Mixed 893
SusWrite 732
219% 976 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 51.5
174% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 502
467% 728 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 183%
Great: 235%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 185 185 183 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 148
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 184
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
752GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 40 40 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 40.6
49% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9D8MH-16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 15.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 10.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO9-900 Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO9-900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $878
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback