HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 17-ca0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84D2
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 10:03
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 181
64% 114 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 238
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84D2) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 7.75
5% 8.84 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 13.9
8% 9.94 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280P4 240GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP122PH0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 671
Write 567
Mixed 210
106% 483 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 47.8
147% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 644
DQ Write 502
DQ Mixed 170
237% 439 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 25.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 19.1
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-ca0xxx Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback