Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U 15,631 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Memory 47.8 1-Core 17.3 2-Core 13.4 21% 26.2 Pts	4-Core 52.6 8-Core 69.6 8% 61.1 Pts	64-Core 68.9 4% 68.9 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU) 18,674 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1259) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20.36 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.7% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 7 Parallax 6 3% 5.6 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 9.2 5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.7% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hfs256g3 9TND-N210A 256GB 139 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 182 178 192 176 170 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 308 Write 236 Mixed 173 SusWrite 183 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 13.2 42% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 155 122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GB 19,360 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.5% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 5.9 26% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	239x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples	157x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	33x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	57x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	19x
SD9SN8W256G1014 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 2,343 samples	18x

RAM
AO1P24HC4N2-BWCS 2x4GBAdataBench 70%, 856 samples	39x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples	34x
AO1P24HC4N2-BWCS 1x4GBAdataBench 39%, 720 samples	21x