Sony VPCW160AB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive16.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSony VPCW160AB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 00:47
Run Duration901 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N280
N/A, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Memory 29.2
1-Core 5.3
2-Core 10.9
12% 15.1 Pts
4-Core 9.9
8-Core 10.4
1% 10.1 Pts
64-Core 10
1% 10 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 68 67 66 63 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.6% Very poor
Read 70.9
Write 72.5
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 67.1
17% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 7.1
27% 9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 36
DQ Mixed 16.5
16% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
9GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.5 4.3 4 4.4 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Read 24
Write 3.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 4.4
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.8% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2
7% 2.3 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 0.5
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 259
15% 259 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback