Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
VIA C7-M 1600MHz 28 User benchmarks, average bench 14% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Memory 24.7 1-Core 5.2 2-Core 6.1 10% 12 Pts	4-Core 6.3 8-Core 6.3 1% 6.3 Pts	64-Core 6.3 0% 6.3 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PC128HAFU-000L1 128GB 715 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM06L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 90 92 88 90 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.3% Poor	Read 139 Write 106 Mixed 104 SusWrite 89.5 25% 110 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 14.5 51% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 43.4 DQ Mixed 22.2 20% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 74%
Maxtor OneTouch III 60GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 17GB free, PID 7250 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	9.85% Terrible	Read 22.8 Write 16.9 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 16.9 22% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.85% Great: 15%
Multi Flash Reader 2GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.2 5 5.2 5.3 5.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	2.97% Terrible	Read 8.9 Write 2.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.1 6% 5.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.97% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.4% Terrible	MC Read 1.3 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 2 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 288 14% 288 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.4% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM