ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion FR402AA-ABF m9467fr

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion FR402AA-ABF m9467fr (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081023
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '20 at 18:59
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 68.8 1-Core 32.3 2-Core 63.8 38% 55 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 132 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 1.22 2% 1.89 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 1.87 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 139 131 53 93 81 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.4% Below average	Read 137 Write 139 Mixed 88.4 SusWrite 107 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 14.3 45% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 63.8 68% 115 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 88%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 695GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 87 86 89 89 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 84.6 Write 81.8 Mixed 49.1 SusWrite 86.7 55% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 51%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-60ZCT1 320GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 142GB free, PID 110c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 17 20 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 18.9 Write 16.8 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 18.3 23% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.2 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback