Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C55D-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55D-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 22:51
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3800 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Memory 35.8
1-Core 20.2
2-Core 36.9
21% 31 Pts
4-Core 78.2
8-Core 71.5
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 78.5
5% 78.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8280
Toshiba(1179 FA26) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 1.88
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 2.87
2% 2.28 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3OA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 20 12 22 19 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.55% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 20.7
9% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.55%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Kingston TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55D-A Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55D-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback