Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Eng Sample: ZE1807C3T4MFB_37/33_Y 6 User benchmarks, average bench 68% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 56.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 187 64% 116 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 558 54% 446 Pts	64-Core 606 38% 606 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 48 54 7.2 32 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 396 Write 52.8 Mixed 17.1 SusWrite 29.8 26% 124 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 11.6 47% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 64 DQ Mixed 41 42% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 55%
Asmt 2115 64GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 60GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 155 156 155 154 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 346 Write 148 Mixed 147 SusWrite 154 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 2.4 27% 8.6 MB/s	DQ Read 35.6 DQ Write 44.2 DQ Mixed 23.6 22% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 57%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 324GB free Firmware: GR2OA230 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 92 91 91 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 92.1 Write 87.9 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 91.1 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D4SS12082SH24A-B 2x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	81.9% Excellent	MC Read 30 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 28.8 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 22.1 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16