Lenovo 30ATA02LLM

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 30ATA02LLM (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 30C0
Memory	49.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200923
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '20 at 08:00
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 1,202 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Memory 34.4 1-Core 100 2-Core 170 54% 102 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 37.4 17% 106 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600 3,885 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 11BD) 2GB CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.7 Reflection 13 Parallax 17.8 17% 17.1 fps	MRender 20 Gravity 18.1 Splatting 19.4 16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70 2,931 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 180 212 151 219 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 1,125 Write 252 Mixed 888 SusWrite 196 136% 615 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 37.3 117% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 415 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 238 182% 254 MB/s
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 242%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 632GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 473 Write 426 Mixed 406 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 39.3 130% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 323 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 40.5 82% 170 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 688GB free Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 475 483 486 471 473 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 157 138 145 148 158 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 157 Write 136 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 148 91% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 113%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 2,418 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 0GB free Firmware: 0836 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 40.7 Write 36.8 Mixed 27.4 26% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 658GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 103 103 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 91.6 Write 90.4 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 102 107% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA THNSNJ128GCST 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 33GB free, PID 6388 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 205 250 265 274 290 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	119% Outstanding	Read 80.1 Write 167 Mixed 303 SusWrite 248 302% 200 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 11.4 985% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 13.8 DQ Write 21.9 DQ Mixed 15.6 1,327% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 167%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 58GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 3.5 9.3 9.3 13 14 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 39.9 Write 29.6 Mixed 34 SusWrite 9 36% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.9 205% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 10.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 230 17% 230 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 30ATA02LLM

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)