Toshiba Satellite P10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite P10 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA DAW01/DAL01
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.2 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20051117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '20 at 19:02
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Mobile Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz 10 User benchmarks, average bench 26% NWD, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Memory 36.4 1-Core 34.3 2-Core 31.5 24% 34.1 Pts	4-Core 32.2 8-Core 32.5 4% 32.3 Pts	64-Core 33.9 2% 33.9 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 Toshiba(1179 FF00) Driver: Ver. 6.14.10.6422 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.31 0% 0.24 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 120GB 1,698 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 86GB free Firmware: Q0720A SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 6.5 2.9 5.7 18 27 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.3% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 35.8 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 12.3 6% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 20.9 4K Mixed 9.4 27% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 32.8 DQ Write 40 DQ Mixed 34.1 26% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 109%
SH00M240GB 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0817B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 5.8 2.7 6 14 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.2% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 6.3 Mixed 12.1 SusWrite 11.2 11% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 38%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 26GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 0 5.8 1.8 4.2 4.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	2.67% Terrible	Read 11.8 Write 1.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 3 6% 5.15 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.67% Great: 6%
Patriot Memory 127GB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 29GB free, PID 6000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 6.1 1.9 5 5.9 6.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	4.91% Terrible	Read 7.6 Write 13 Mixed 14.3 SusWrite 4.8 14% 9.93 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 49% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 4.91% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	5.65% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 1.2 5% 1.63 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.27 GB/s	Latency 220 18% 220 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.65% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba Satellite P10

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)