Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2181

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 2181  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G585
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 14:48
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Memory 51
1-Core 18.2
2-Core 34.2
25% 34.5 Pts
4-Core 35.1
8-Core 35.2
5% 35.2 Pts
64-Core 34.3
2% 34.3 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310M
Legend(17AA 397F) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.6.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 1.34
1% 1.24 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 77 67 87 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 98.5
Write 99.5
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 73.4
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 63%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 8GB
3GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 9.7 8.9 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 9.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 9.7
13% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 8%
Generic External 320GB
278GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 25 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 26
Write 21
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 24.3
30% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2181 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 2181

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback