Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 23:36
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 267
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 942
87% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,446
97% 1,446 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Lighting 95.7
Reflection 93.3
Parallax 87
77% 92 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 83.6
Splatting 74.5
71% 90.8 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 408
Write 44
Mixed 61.7
36% 171 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 28.8
109% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 77.3
90% 165 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
20GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 99 113 106 102 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 106
62% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$51
176GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 182 180 179 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 131
Write 183
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 176
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 107%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
22GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 294
Write 35.8
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 35.9
102% 107 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 5.2
869% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 5.6
894% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
67.4% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.7
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 26.4
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 5,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $893
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback