Shuttle SG31

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemShuttle SG31  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FG31
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090410
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 00:16
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 41.6
28% 39.6 Pts
4-Core 81.9
8-Core 82.8
11% 82.4 Pts
64-Core 81.8
5% 81.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
Sapphire(174B A004) 2GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 25 15 56 84 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47% Average
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 58.9
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 47%
Great: 113%
Generic- SD/MMC 250GB
71GB free, PID 0119
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.8 10 10 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.11% Terrible
Read 14.4
Write 13.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 10
17% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.6
146% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.11%
Great: 15%
Generic- SD/MMC 253GB
21GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.3 6.6 6.8 6.7 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.08% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 7.2
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 6.8
12% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.6
108% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.08%
Great: 14%
Generic- SD/MMC 197GB
20GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 7.6 8.8 9 8.9 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 10.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 8.6
14% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SG31 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Shuttle SG31

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback