Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 16:06
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 196
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 372
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Asus(1043 8750) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 71.2
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 68.1
58% 70.1 fps
MRender 58.6
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 56.8
50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 109 59 82 132 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 986
Write 532
Mixed 295
SusWrite 117
106% 483 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 17.2
42% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 61.5
DQ Write 75
DQ Mixed 32.1
34% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 182%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
21GB free
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 94 96 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 181
Write 140
Mixed 130
SusWrite 93.8
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 28
104% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 104
84% 119 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 61%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
349GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 76 79 76 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 74.7
Write 71.7
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 76.8
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 59%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
74GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 60 61 59 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 51.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 60.3
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 65%
EASTIC FP120 1GB
0GB free, PID 5720
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.7
1% 0.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
9% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600EL Series Kingston 99U5584-017.A00LF 1600EL Series Kingston 99U5584-017.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $570
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback