Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 139 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 40.9 1-Core 49 2-Core 71.8 33% 53.9 Pts	4-Core 74 8-Core 68.8 10% 71.4 Pts	64-Core 72.1 4% 72.1 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 312F) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.26.18 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	2.43% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 3.5 2% 3.27 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 5.5 3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.43% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BMSC51A3250F4SA 250GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 74 26 44 32 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 385 Write 354 Mixed 14.4 SusWrite 73.6 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 0.4 27% 7.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB 96,646 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.8% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 7.9 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 30%, 139 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	4x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
M.2 PCIe SSD 256GBSpccBench 162%, 15,205 samples	1x
Genuine 250GBOEMBench 49%, 11 samples	1x

RAM
RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 1x4GBRamaxelBench 26%, 4,120 samples	3x
CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GBCrucialBench 44%, 1,443 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $25