Lenovo 30BFS5LK0S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30BFS5LK0S  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1036
Memory48.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190320
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 10:52
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2195
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 124
53% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 386
33% 281 Pts
64-Core 2,242
139% 2,242 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.6% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 47.4
36% 49.1 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 55.5
38% 45.4 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,230
Write 1626
Mixed 1,479
394% 1,778 MB/s
4K Read 63.9
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 88.3
296% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1034
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 935
697% 928 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$292
429GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 626 639 1432 1307 1564 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,657
Write 2,550
Mixed 1,491
SusWrite 1,018
431% 1,929 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 69.6
261% 99 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 929
DQ Mixed 1,050
783% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 295%
Great: 425%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 2TB
505GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 347 223 231 230 343 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 389
Write 378
Mixed 348
SusWrite 291
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 28.7
93% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 88.8
DQ Mixed 145
100% 126 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7CJR8N-VK 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 57.9
MC Mixed 40.7
133% 46.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 10
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback