HP EliteBook 2760p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 2760p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 162A
Memory5.7 GB free of 9 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161007
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 24 '17 at 21:31
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 154
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 214
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 162A) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
2% 2.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VK0480GDPVT 480GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 495
Write 354
Mixed 394
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 13
67% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 48.6
DQ Mixed 13.9
16% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9GB
null MHz
8192, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 2760p Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2760p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback