Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Memory 47 1-Core 20 2-Core 40 25% 35.7 Pts	4-Core 40.5 8-Core 39.2 5% 39.8 Pts	64-Core 40.5 2% 40.5 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AD1) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.982.10.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S 700 250GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 174 176 182 167 184 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.4% Average	Read 204 Write 111 Mixed 200 SusWrite 175 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 15.7 57% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 97.2 DQ Mixed 40.3 50% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 10GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 4 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 3.2 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5773CH0-CH9 RAMAXEL RMR1810EF48E7W1333 3GBSamsungBench 10%, 4 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16