Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5870 2,085 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 70.3 1-Core 24.8 2-Core 44.8 34% 46.6 Pts	4-Core 43.8 8-Core 40.5 6% 42.2 Pts	64-Core 43.9 3% 43.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430 731 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 30E9) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 63 105 69 59 68 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.9% Poor	Read 203 Write 158 Mixed 160 SusWrite 68.1 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 17.9 4K Mixed 11.7 46% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27.6 DQ Write 48.3 DQ Mixed 31.8 26% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T5870IntelBench 34%, 2,085 samples	8x
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	4x
Pentium Dual T3400Intel $70Bench 33%, 2,721 samples	3x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3430ATIBench 1%, 731 samples	20x

SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GBSamsungBench 75%, 878 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16