Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20LNS0Q400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20LNS0Q400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20LNS0Q400
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190211
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 26 '21 at 15:12
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 56
2-Core 113
39% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 181
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Legend(17AA 506E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.8
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt256g TOSHIBA 256GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0107ADLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 156 211 258 139 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 484
Write 162
Mixed 340
SusWrite 165
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 12.4
72% 18 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20LNS0Q400 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20LNS0Q400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback