Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 169A
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120816
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 27 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-60 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 41.2
1-Core 14.5
2-Core 27.6
20% 27.8 Pts
4-Core 27.8
8-Core 25.2
4% 26.5 Pts
64-Core 27.9
2% 27.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6290
HP(103C 169A) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
0.39% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.39%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 166 66 55 54 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.6% Poor
Read 234
Write 209
Mixed 204
SusWrite 98
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 7
27% 8.77 MB/s
DQ Read 74.8
DQ Write 61.4
DQ Mixed 70.5
52% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.34% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.07 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 2.5
5% 1.9 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback