Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30A8S02V0B

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 30A8S02V0B (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141230
Uptime	13.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '17 at 08:28
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 369 User benchmarks, average bench 48% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 67 1-Core 55.9 2-Core 115 48% 79.2 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 449 40% 338 Pts	64-Core 670 41% 670 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Asus(1043 841B) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	30.1% Below average	Lighting 35.2 Reflection 34.2 Parallax 43.3 29% 37.6 fps	MRender 47.8 Gravity 40.2 Splatting 35 33% 41 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 44GB free Firmware: 6L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8885 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4008 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 91 91 100 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 6240 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 48 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 10044207 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (EC) Unknown 99 99 32 (ED) Unknown 99 99 100 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	40.7% Average	Read 332 Write 61.8 Mixed 149 39% 181 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 11.7 57% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 31.3 55% 110 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 80%
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB 3,843 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6945 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3725 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 186 186 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 46 (C2) HDA temperature 71 64 154620330013 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	62.9% Good	Read 490 Write 394 Mixed 470 101% 451 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 14.7 60% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 11.8 DQ Write 33.2 DQ Mixed 12.9 13% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 100%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 1,557 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 38GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 147 Write 40.3 Mixed 36.2 73% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.87 126% 5.75 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G1A2 4x4GB 557 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 12 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.9% Average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 18 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 12 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback