Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P7H55D-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100722
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '21 at 01:52
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 143 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 357 39% 307 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5750 12,403 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E138) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	8.45% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 10.1 9% 11 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 7.9 7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.45% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 659GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 122 124 123 123 123 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.8% Average	Read 210 Write 207 Mixed 197 SusWrite 123 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 26.1 88% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 33.4 DQ Write 67.2 DQ Mixed 44 35% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 133%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 38GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 55 58 59 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 63 Write 63.5 Mixed 44 SusWrite 57.4 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 156GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 55 58 59 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 68.5 Write 70.5 Mixed 56 SusWrite 57.4 47% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 193GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 127 126 125 127 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 145 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 126 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$46 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 83GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 93 93 93 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 104 Write 101 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 92.3 68% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 108%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 808GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 32 Write 27.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 19.2 33% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 63%
Disk drive 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 120GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.1% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 25.8 Mixed 26 SusWrite 13.6 31% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 12%
Disk drive 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 509GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.4% Terrible	Read 30.3 Write 26 Mixed 16 SusWrite 13.7 27% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.4% Great: 17%
WD Elements 2621 2TB 11,378 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 830GB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 67 66 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 98.5 Write 87.8 Mixed 47 SusWrite 66.6 97% 75 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.9 144% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 64%
Disk drive 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 392GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 26 Mixed 20 SusWrite 13.7 29% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 16%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 417GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 30 Write 24.8 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 18.8 32% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	21x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	14x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	7x

SSD
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	28x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	19x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $518

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16