Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H (all builds)
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100817
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '21 at 22:56
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ 5,372 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	21% Poor	Memory 32 1-Core 29.9 2-Core 50.8 23% 37.6 Pts	4-Core 57.1 8-Core 68.2 8% 62.6 Pts	64-Core 68.4 4% 68.4 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 2382) 1GB CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 27.6 Parallax 5.3 16% 17.7 fps	MRender 29 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 19.5 19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 163 63 62 60 58 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.6% Above average	Read 240 Write 203 Mixed 207 SusWrite 86.3 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 32.2 103% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 123 92% 123 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 124%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB 11,411 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 283GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 50 55 56 56 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 32.9 Write 37.9 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 52 28% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 51%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 31GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 43 43 43 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 45 Write 43.6 Mixed 38 SusWrite 42.8 31% 42.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 4.8 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 4 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 243 16% 243 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA78GM-S2H Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	4x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	7x
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	2x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	10x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	5x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16