Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P35C-S3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P35C-S3  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '21 at 16:13
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6850-$57
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 44.2
35% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 62.1
8-Core 57.1
8% 59.6 Pts
64-Core 55.6
3% 55.6 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1950 Pro
Sapphire(174B E190) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver:
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CP100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 29 71 66 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 24.8
Write 27.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 53.6
24% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
43% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P35C-S3 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P35C-S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback