Today's hottest deals

Asus M3N78-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M3N78-EM  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090408
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '21 at 03:28
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9650-$125
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 55.4
28% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 101
15% 107 Pts
64-Core 67
4% 67 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 SE
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 648 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.47% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 11.4
9% 12.8 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 11
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.47%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 29 17 30 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 23.2
Write 55.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 29.6
26% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3N78-EM Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3N78-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback