HP ZBook Studio G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook Studio G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 826B
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '21 at 21:32
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 223
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 583
63% 498 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200
HP(103C 826B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.25
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 19.2
14% 18.1 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 16.2
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1191 1383 1313 1388 1374 1400 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,823
Write 1,469
Mixed 542
SusWrite 1,341
289% 1,294 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 54.8
196% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 333
269% 390 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 234%
Great: 306%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
60GB free
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,791
Write 1,540
Mixed 604
290% 1,312 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 64.9
226% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,129
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 968
739% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 306%
ASMT 2115 1.5TB
292GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 97 95 96 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 98.6
Write 77.4
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 95
107% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1
169% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS7AFR8N-UH 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio G4 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback