Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4600 6,872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 47.4 1-Core 27 2-Core 54.3 28% 42.9 Pts	4-Core 52.8 8-Core 52.3 7% 52.5 Pts	64-Core 54 3% 54 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP600 32GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 29 15 29 35 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.4% Poor	Read 190 Write 31.4 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 28.8 17% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 15.1 62% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 15.9 DQ Write 38.5 DQ Mixed 18.5 17% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 62%
Excelstor Technology J8080S 82GB 234 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 76GB free Firmware: P21OAB3A SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 70 70 70 67 67 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 72 Write 61.9 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 67.9 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.25% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.25% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	23x
Pentium Dual E2200Intel $54Bench 33%, 8,325 samples	15x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	14x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	12x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	6x

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $141

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16