Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '21 at 23:40
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 91.8 1-Core 132 2-Core 262 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 487 8-Core 684 74% 585 Pts	64-Core 734 45% 734 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1E91) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 8.8 Parallax 7.3 5% 7.4 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 10.3 7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile) 33,798 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Asus(1043 1E91) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.3% Average	Lighting 54.8 Reflection 62.4 Parallax 53.2 45% 56.8 fps	MRender 62.8 Gravity 50.1 Splatting 48.9 44% 53.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB 10,140 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 220 220 220 220 220 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1,442 Write 878 Mixed 925 SusWrite 243 193% 872 MB/s	4K Read 47.3 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 64.5 222% 79.8 MB/s	DQ Read 682 DQ Write 688 DQ Mixed 578 464% 649 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 189%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 223GB free Firmware: CS900BB3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 429 421 425 428 424 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Read 427 Write 368 Mixed 373 SusWrite 423 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 35.7 129% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 198 171% 250 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.5% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 22.7 78% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 37.6 SC Mixed 24.5 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	1,530x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	1,231x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	1,045x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	394x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	354x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	530x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	488x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	366x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16