Lenovo 82B5

Performance Results

Gaming 49%
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 46%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82B5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '22 at 22:15
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 258
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 748
76% 618 Pts
64-Core 997
62% 997 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A3E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 56.1
48% 60.1 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 50.9
45% 55.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 341 333 333 326 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,360
Write 2,021
Mixed 1,592
SusWrite 368
353% 1,585 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 83.4
274% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 824
DQ Mixed 960
707% 930 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 243%
Great: 264%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
98GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,523
Write 2,384
Mixed 1,705
490% 2,204 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 88.4
297% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 928
DQ Mixed 1,038
784% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 36.1
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 21.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82B5 Builds (Compare 1,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop 78%
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82B5

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback