Asrock N3150-NUC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock N3150-NUC (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Ð¦Ð²ÐµÑÐ°: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '15 at 16:27
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 22.7 2-Core 45.7 16% 34.2 Pts	4-Core 91 8-Core 88.8 12% 89.9 Pts	64-Core 91.2 6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 18% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 22B1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4234 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 2.5 1% 2.31 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 2.91 2% 2.39 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100 901 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 47777297 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -64012192579447 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 44 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 30 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 58 70 85903933498 (C2) HDA temperature 58 70 85903933498 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 47777297 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 47777297 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 47777297 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 174 (EA) Unknown 0 0 130 (F1) Unknown 0 0 130 (F2) Unknown 0 0 119 (F4) Unknown 100 100 262145	58.8% Above average	Read 458 Write 220 Mixed 307 72% 328 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 17.5 79% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 89.6 DQ Write 62.1 DQ Mixed 39.5 39% 63.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 81%
WD My Book 1110 749GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 628GB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 37.9 Write 40.5 Mixed 39.5 51% 39.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.34 74% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 20%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	6.68% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 12.7 Mixed 15.2 19% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.66 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.007 18% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.68% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N3150-NUC Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N3150-NUC

CPU
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	7x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	7x

SSD
128GB 128GBKingchuxingBench 69%, 246 samples	3x
PX-128M6M 128GBPlextorBench 80%, 527 samples	1x
SB2 256GBBench 70%, 169 samples	1x

RAM
TS256MSK64W6N 2x2GBTranscendBench 39%, 40 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,963 samples	2x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 2x4GBRAMAXELBench 42%, 3,176 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock N3150-NUC

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock N3150-NUC

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)