HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 01:02
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 199
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 392
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 35.6
Parallax 33.3
27% 34 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 23.8
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GBSJ 128GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CJTA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 210
Write 157
Mixed 102
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 19.7
64% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 38.5
DQ Mixed 26.7
21% 28 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.8% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback