Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8748
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201104
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '21 at 15:35
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	BHR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 82.5 1-Core 78.7 2-Core 142 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 247 29% 224 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile) 23,316 User benchmarks, average bench 88% HP(103C 8748) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 2851 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 122 Parallax 129 99% 124 fps	MRender 152 Gravity 122 Splatting 111 103% 128 fps
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 99%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB 17,828 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0NEXF SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 794 795 771 762 756 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	194% Outstanding	Read 2,040 Write 1,778 Mixed 1,551 SusWrite 796 345% 1,541 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 48.5 166% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 428 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 281 210% 288 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 306%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 698GB free Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1854 1741 1748 1742 1745 1743 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	241% Outstanding	Read 1,896 Write 1,796 Mixed 1,659 SusWrite 1762 401% 1,778 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 42.2 143% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 451 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 277 211% 294 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 241% Great: 347%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB 7,320 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 622GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 136 135 134 134 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 107 Write 125 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 134 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.3 140% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3000 C18 2x16GB 385 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	68.5% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 24.3 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 21.1 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	453x
RTX 2070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 88%, 23,316 samples	320x
RTX 2080S (Super Mobile)NvidiaBench 116%, 2,359 samples	255x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	442x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	142x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	58x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	522x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	146x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	92x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16