Lenovo 10VG002LRU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10VG002LRU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3130
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '21 at 08:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 159
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 487
33% 308 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3130) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 22.5
9% 15.3 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 14
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1088 299 299 301 304 302 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,209
Write 1,281
Mixed 1,161
SusWrite 432
281% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 72.6
243% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 872
DQ Write 665
DQ Mixed 807
593% 781 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 225%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.3
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback